The infrastructure bill involving the definition of taxation in the crypto market passed the U.S. Senate with a high vote and is now sent to the House of Representatives

The infrastructure bill involving the definition of taxation in the crypto market passed the U.S. Senate with a high vote and is now sent to the House of Representatives

Sens. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) and Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.) introduced an amendment on Monday to clarify the definition of the word "broker" in the infrastructure bill, but it was ultimately blocked by Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.).

Ultimately, the U.S. Senate passed its bipartisan infrastructure bill on Tuesday with a vote of 69 to 30, and it has been submitted to the House of Representatives.

The bill would invest $1 trillion in infrastructure improvements over the next 10 years, including about $550 billion in new spending, and is expected to raise $28 billion from a cryptocurrency tax provision that expands the definition of a "broker," leading the crypto community to worry that the IRS could impose broker-like tax reporting requirements on non-broker entities such as miners.

Many participants in the cryptocurrency industry have initiated initiatives to propose amendments to the provision to precisely define “brokers.” Senators Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Pat Toomey (R-Pa.), and Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.) proposed to clearly define what types of entities are brokers, while a competing amendment from Senators Rob Portman (R-Ohio), Mark Warner (D-Va.), and Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.) proposed a narrower definition that exempts only miners participating in PoS.

Ultimately, the Senate did not consider any amendments and only discussed the base bill during the Sunday night vote.

Toomey, Lummis, Warner, Sinema and Portman agreed on Monday to propose a new amendment, which requires unanimous consent under Senate procedural rules. Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.) objected to the provision, blocking it from being added to the agenda.

The infrastructure bill will now go to the House of Representatives, which is expected to take up the issue this fall. Several members of the House are interested in making reasonable changes to the definition of "broker." But it is unclear how much leeway the House will have to amend the bill.


<<:  Alchemy Pay will cooperate with Mastercard to launch a virtual cryptocurrency card that will support more than 40 cryptocurrencies including Bitcoin

>>:  VanEck applies for "Bitcoin Strategy ETF", SEC Chairman says it is likely to be approved

Recommend

How to tell a man's fortune from his face and palm

Our palms and faces can reveal information about ...

What does the interrupted career line mean?

If a person's career line is intermittent, it ...

Will a woman with a raised chin be rich in the future?

Each of us is unique, everyone has our own charac...

A man who loves money more than you love him

A man who loves money more than you love him In t...

The face of a woman who must not be married

The face of a woman who must not be married When ...

Interpretation: Coinshares 2019 latest global mining research report

The third issue: Coinshares 2019 latest global mi...

Data Analysis: Will FIL’s target be $8?

So if a strange voice calls your name, you must n...

1. Triangular eyes

Love money like life 1. Triangular eyes Old peopl...

MicroStrategy: 226,500 BTC

MicroStrategy earnings report Business intelligen...

What does it mean if a boy has a mole at the corner of his eye?

Many people have moles on their faces, and differ...

Analysis of the palmistry fortune line for women who are prone to losing money

How to interpret the fortune line in palmistry fo...