Recently, U.S. Senators Jack Reed and Laphonza Butler called on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to stop approving any new digital cryptocurrency ETFs, citing the risks faced by retail investors. Reed and Butler have been very firm in their stance on digital cryptocurrency exchange-traded funds (ETFs), expressing serious concerns about the huge risks these financial products pose to retail investors because they are vulnerable to fraud and market manipulation. This move comes at a time when regulators are conducting a broader review of the digital cryptocurrency market. The two senators said in a statement that given the niche nature of the digital cryptocurrency trading market, the market is not ready to handle the large influx of investor capital that ETFs could trigger, which could destabilize the industry. They believe that the digital cryptocurrency market remains largely unregulated and lacks the transparency and oversight mechanisms common in traditional financial markets. In addition, the two lawmakers also urged the SEC not to allow the recently approved spot Bitcoin ETF to set a precedent for approving new ETFs in the future. They believe that while the Bitcoin market is more mature and better scrutinized, the markets for other cryptocurrencies are more susceptible to misconduct. The two also called for increased supervision of Bitcoin ETF products that have already been launched, including regulatory review of brokers and advisors. Some industry observers believe that the success of the spot Bitcoin ETF has made some members of Congress on Capitol Hill uneasy. Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas said: "The huge success of the Bitcoin ETF has made the top people uneasy. They are a little regretful." The call to pause the approval of new crypto ETFs highlights lawmakers' growing concerns about the intersection of crypto assets with mainstream financial products. The two lawmakers' call also echoes concerns from other parts of the U.S. government and financial industry experts, who have been outspoken about the potential for market manipulation in thinly traded crypto assets because the decentralized nature of cryptocurrencies and the lack of a central regulator make it challenging to effectively monitor and reduce fraudulent activities. Now, as the SEC begins considering the senators’ request, the future of digital currency ETFs hangs in the balance. The outcome could have far-reaching implications for the cryptocurrency market and the millions of retail investors who want to gain exposure to digital assets through traditional investment vehicles. |
<<: BTC may not have a long-term decline basis at this stage
>>: With nearly $100 million in cash, how do crypto financiers influence the US election?
Author: Xiao Sa Legal Team Mining machines are co...
A man who can bring happiness to a woman Men are ...
What is the Ethereum Difficulty Bomb? Difficulty ...
Wu Blockchain learned from multiple channels that...
Swift, a global financial communications service ...
To maintain decentralized power, cryptocurrencies...
Rage Comment : The United States, Russia and othe...
As a new network information technology, blockcha...
Authors of this article: Zhang Feng, partner of W...
Coinbase, known as the "first stock of crypt...
We all know that having moles on the face is a ve...
The traces left by moles in different positions a...
What are the types of peach blossom moles on the ...
In today's digital age, website security moni...
Open Finance is one of Multicoin's three cryp...