According to the complaint filed by the SEC with the Connecticut Federal Court, the agency accused
According to the SEC’s complaint: From August to December 2014, Garza and his company sold More than 10,000 investors bought Hashlet contracts, which were touted as always profitable and never outdated. Investors were misled into believing that they would receive ongoing Bitcoin mining income after purchasing these contracts, when in reality GAW Miners had little or no mining power. Because Garza and his company sold far more computing power than they actually owned, they were unable to deliver on the returns they had promised to investors. In the end, most Hashlet investors lost most of their money, and only a few made a profit. The SEC will seek to have Garza disgorge ill-gotten gains and pay interest on civil damages, and the agency is seeking a jury trial, the people said. Original text: http://www.sec.gov/news/pressrelease/2015-271.html |
<<: Can Drivechain make Bitcoin sidechain a reality?
>>: 3 Reasons Onename Switched from Namecoin to Bitcoin
If a person's cheekbones are too low, the fac...
On August 18, the "Opinions of the CPC Centr...
So what is all the fuss about Bitcoin and blockch...
Appearance is very important for a woman, because...
In physiognomy, the chin represents the breadth o...
Although many times, a person's intelligence ...
Interpreting people's destiny from face shape...
According to Xiamen Daily on October 18, Ms. Peng...
No one's life is smooth sailing. Everyone wil...
Some people's hands will have miscellaneous l...
The meaning of moles in different positions is dif...
Although people who are simple and kind will only...
The face of a man who can become famous overnight...
A pie falling from the sky and hitting you right ...
Is it really so magical to know people by their f...