According to the complaint filed by the SEC with the Connecticut Federal Court, the agency accused
According to the SEC’s complaint: From August to December 2014, Garza and his company sold More than 10,000 investors bought Hashlet contracts, which were touted as always profitable and never outdated. Investors were misled into believing that they would receive ongoing Bitcoin mining income after purchasing these contracts, when in reality GAW Miners had little or no mining power. Because Garza and his company sold far more computing power than they actually owned, they were unable to deliver on the returns they had promised to investors. In the end, most Hashlet investors lost most of their money, and only a few made a profit. The SEC will seek to have Garza disgorge ill-gotten gains and pay interest on civil damages, and the agency is seeking a jury trial, the people said. Original text: http://www.sec.gov/news/pressrelease/2015-271.html |
<<: Can Drivechain make Bitcoin sidechain a reality?
>>: 3 Reasons Onename Switched from Namecoin to Bitcoin
The face of a woman who is unwilling to be lonely...
As the saying goes: One dou makes you poor, two d...
Everyone has a mole on their body. Mole is a very...
VCs and market makers are the main front-end barr...
The biggest feature of Bitcoin is decentralizatio...
The wealth line in palmistry can actually show a ...
According to Slack community user Lehoom, Filecoi...
People with thin hair and thick lower lips are vi...
Everyone has his or her own unique strengths, but...
There are many different lines in our palms, and ...
The Litecoin team is working on anonymous transac...
What does a mole on the inner thigh mean? Moles a...
Black forehead In the face, the Yingtang is locat...
A man with a crooked mouth has bad luck Men with ...
"Knowledge of Mining" is a mining scien...