On September 4, a report from the legal financial analysis company IntegraFEC showed that EOS's parent company Block.one had a series of suspicious transactions during the ICO, deliberately pushing up the price of EOS and inducing others to buy ICO tokens. If the findings are true, this would violate the U.S. Securities Act of 1933 and the Exchange Act of 1934. Over 11 months in 2017 and 2018, a little-known software maker called Block.one raised more than $4 billion in an initial coin offering for a new cryptocurrency, EOS, more than almost any other ICO before it. In 2019, the Securities and Exchange Commission fined Block.one $24 million for running an unregistered ICO. EOS token holders sued Block.one last year, calling the sale a "fraudulent scheme" and claiming the company violated securities laws. |
<<: Report: Cryptocurrency to create more than 10,000 jobs in India
>>: Wu said weekly mining information: Ethereum and Fil computing power hit new highs 0830-0905
Moles are also a very important part of physiogno...
In the entertainment industry, we may know someth...
Works by Carbon Chain Value Compilation Team Comp...
Everyone hopes to make friends who treat them sin...
Women with straight eyebrows have the best fate W...
Eyes are a very important part of the five facial...
"Your forehead is black, there will be a blo...
After several downward tests yesterday, the overa...
In fact, sometimes when we tell fortunes, we ofte...
Rage Review : Blockchain token platform WAVES has...
It is too early to call the top after breaking th...
Whether a person’s fortune is good or not can be ...
According to The Block on May 25, cryptocurrency ...
Whether you can have a child or not can be determ...
Rage Comment : SWIFT has customers all over the w...