Estonia's Supreme Court restricts Bitcoin

Estonia's Supreme Court restricts Bitcoin


Trade has always been one of the main uses of Bitcoin. The fluctuation of the price of encrypted digital currency has always been used by short-term traders. Just when the flow of funds in Bitcoin trading was getting better and better, news of the government's review came out. As a result, the Estonian government officially became one of the countries that restricted Bitcoin trading.

The Estonian Supreme Court has recently ordered that Bitcoin trading be included in the scope of anti-money laundering legislation. Once the decree is issued, it will become difficult for digital currency trading in the region. The decision concerns Otto, a Bitcoin entrepreneur whose Bitcoin trading platform BTC.ee was forced to close by law enforcement agencies.

However, the Supreme Court’s action may not be helpful for the development of the Bitcoin ecosystem. The laws issued to regulate Bitcoin are outdated, and if digital currency transactions are supervised, Bitcoin will go the way of the fiat currency system. These laws are not necessary at all, and there is no need to regulate Bitcoin and other digital currencies. This will bring a series of problems to the Bitcoin ecosystem, such as stifling innovative technologies and discouraging the enthusiasm of emerging companies to build Bitcoin and develop blockchain technology.

Instead, the Estonian government should develop more Bitcoin-friendly legal systems, which would not only create a better environment for digital currency businesses, but also make it easier for the government and regional financial institutions to benefit from it.

BTC.ee 's troubles began in 2014 when it received an email from the Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit, a copy of which stated that Otto's Bitcoin-related business violated Estonian law. In the email, the government agency asked Otto to provide company registration details, anti-money laundering legal provisions, operating procedures functions as a financial institution, and customer identity documents.

Otto's application to establish a Bitcoin exchange was rejected twice, once by the Tallinn Administrative Court and once by the Tallinn Circuit Court. Finally, the Supreme Court dealt a fatal blow. In order to set priorities and give Bitcoin a fair chance to develop in Estonia, Otto took up legal weapons to fight. But now it seems that he has failed.

Otto hoped that the case would be transferred from the Estonian Supreme Court to the European Court of Justice, but he did not get his wish. Bitcoin has many uses waiting to be discovered, and placing it under an outdated legal system and restricting it is not a good thing for society.


<<:  Political hackers use Bitcoin to manipulate elections in nine Latin American countries

>>:  Bitcoin and Multicoin wallet provider CoinWallet shuts down

Recommend

Will DAO be the next hot spot in the blockchain field?

It’s an emerging solution, a way to automate the ...

Announcement | Qitmeer-Medina Network 2.0 Upgrade Announcement

Dear all Qitmeer community users, Medina Network ...

What does the Sun and Tianliang in the life palace represent?

The Sun, which belongs to the Fire element, repre...

What does it mean for people born with forehead wrinkles?

Some wrinkles appear as people get older, but som...

What kind of face is easy to become a monk?

Monks are compassionate. As the saying goes, if I...

Talking about blockchain (19): Security risks of Bitcoin wallets

People are currently keen on speculating in Bitco...

Fuyuancoin Hong Kong Trading Center will officially open on New Year's Day 2016

According to multiple media reports, the Fuyuan C...

Mole physiognomy: Which mole is the best on the face?

From a physiological point of view, moles on the ...