Chairman of the Chamber of Digital Commerce: Overly stringent U.S. legal regulations may "drive away" a large number of blockchain companies

Chairman of the Chamber of Digital Commerce: Overly stringent U.S. legal regulations may "drive away" a large number of blockchain companies

Note: The author of this article is Perianne Boring, President of the Chamber of Digital Commerce.

In the United States, the outdated legal system has hurt blockchain startups, and more and more startups are choosing to move abroad. According to the law, many blockchain companies are suspected of violating the US money transmission law. The US federal government has a clear definition of companies engaged in currency business, while state government legislation in this regard needs to be improved. Many companies involved in cryptocurrency business but not providing payment services find it difficult to obtain business licenses.

Money transmission laws apply to both the federal government and state governments in the United States. The U.S. federal government requires businesses that provide money services (MSBs) to register with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). State governments have not issued any specific regulations for this industry. The main issues facing blockchain companies in the United States are as follows:

  1. 48 states in the U.S. regulate money transmission (out of 50 states)

  2. Regardless of how many states MSBs have customers in, they need to obtain a license from the state where their customers are located (even if they only have one customer in a state).

  3. A license issued in any state in the United States is not valid in other states (a license cannot be used across state lines)

  4. The license is expensive

  5. The legislation in the blockchain field in each state is unclear (legal loopholes)

For most blockchain companies, the application process for a complete operating license is too cumbersome. This is why after the collapse of Mt. Gox, there has never been an exchange in the United States that has a complete license and can operate freely in the country.

US blockchain companies spend between 200至500万美金per year on licenses alone. Most startups simply can’t afford it. In contrast, Luxembourg Bitcoin exchange Bitstamp (funded by US venture capital firm Pantera) spent less than $1 million during the two years it applied for an EU payment license. Bitstamp recently obtained the license and is now accepted in all 28 EU member states. It is precisely because of this EU practice that it has surpassed the US in the field of financial technology innovation. Sadly,超过75%的风投资金都来自美国.

There are two choices facing US blockchain startups: either take huge risks and refuse to apply for licenses, or give up some customers and markets because they cannot afford the high application fees. In many cases, blockchain companies will fall into operational difficulties or even go bankrupt due to a decrease in customers and a reduction in business scope. This is a vicious cycle that will eventually lead to the collapse of the US blockchain industry.

In the United States, many laws were drafted before the Internet was even invented. Now is the time to make appropriate changes. The blockchain industry also favors issuing a national license, like the UK.

The U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency is considering issuing financial technology licenses to support the development of this field, but it may be a long time before this happens.

Meanwhile, some state governments are working to address this issue. Take New York, for example. New York created a new licensing system (BitLicense) that has sparked controversy. So far, only two companies have successfully obtained BitLicense (Gemini and Ripple). The North Carolina Senate just voted to legalize virtual currencies and blockchain technology. This is definitely progress (although not perfect).

The best thing about blockchain technology is its decentralized ecosystem, but the US regulators have not seen this. Many countries have recognized the advantages of blockchain technology and have issued various policies to attract blockchain startups to take root. We live in the United States, which has become a world economic leader since World War I, and we are certainly very proud of this. The United States is famous for encouraging innovation and freedom of thought. However, the government has hindered the development of innovative technology - blockchain due to its outdated legal system. We must rewrite the law and rebuild a robust innovation system.


<<:  BitPay and Coinsecure of India partner to provide Bitcoin payment services to merchants, grabbing 1 billion middle-class consumers

>>:  Making Smart Contracts Dumb: Some Thoughts on the Dao Incident

Recommend

Joseph Young: Bitcoin's rally is more sustainable than previous bull cycles

Crypto analyst Joseph Young said on Twitter that ...

Analysis of the characteristics of women with strong sexual desire

It is difficult to completely hide human desires, ...

Photos of Bitcoin and Antminer mining farms (Part 2)

The Bitcoin mining farm photo collection activity...

Galaxy: Devcon 2024 — Ethereum’s North Star

What is Ethereum? Ethereum is the world's mos...

Several aspects of regular life

In fact, it is like this at all times. Without ru...

Bitcoin will change money like the internet changed video

Back in the 80s, there were essentially only thre...

What do different wrinkles reflect about your personality?

If you want to understand a person’s character, y...

BTC mining rewards are about to be halved. What else will have halvings?

There has been a lot of buzz about the Bitcoin ha...

Palmistry marriage line how to read the marriage line

When it comes to the marriage line, perhaps most ...

Get the first lesson paper book of Snowball Fund for free, worth 59 yuan

As a leading investor community in China, the fre...

Whether a woman is destined to make money can be seen from her nose

In physiognomy, a person's fortune can be ana...