Banks miss out on the 'blockchain high-speed train' and could lose out on a $150 billion feast

Banks miss out on the 'blockchain high-speed train' and could lose out on a $150 billion feast

The financial industry has paid a lot of attention to blockchain technology. Although more and more banks have shown interest in distributed ledger technology, blockchain technology, the overall attitude is still "wait and see". Some experts believe that if banks do not get on the blockchain train as soon as possible, they will pay a high price in the long run.

It must be said that the financial sector seems to struggle with the decision-making process whenever blockchain technology is mentioned. Depending on who you ask, the technology may not [have] a first-mover advantage that needs to be considered. Distributed ledger solutions take time to develop, and initial projects will require some fine-tuning.

Blockchain’s moment has arrived

Additionally, banks seem to have a herd mentality when it comes to participating in the blockchain industry. For example, joining consortiums such as the R3 banking consortium, but this is not the best outcome in the long run. At the same time, it is important to establish partnerships in this field at an early stage. All R3 participants will use similar technologies that are interoperable between all these institutions. This approach may go a long way in terms of cross-border payments.

On the other hand, the banks’ approach makes it hard to see the way forward. Because blockchain will have the biggest impact in the areas of international payments and trade finance, there really needs to be a clear course of action. At the moment, there doesn’t seem to be a particular direction for all these projects to move forward.

The innovative side of blockchain technology cannot be ignored. The number of banks not participating in blockchain development efforts is still far greater than the number of banks that want to innovate. For competitors that fail to keep up with customer expectations and demands, financial losses will almost certainly occur quickly. To be more precise, banks could lose up to $150 billion in revenue by not participating in blockchain development.

Experimenting with distributed ledger technology before releasing it to the public is the right course of action. However, rather than being wary of potential scalability issues, a proactive approach is necessary. Financial institutions need to step up their presence in blockchain developments if they want to stay ahead of the curve. In this age of innovation and divergent customer demands, doing nothing is simply not an option.


<<:  Fintech startup Revolut raises €7.75 million to enable zero-fee overseas transactions

>>:  Türkiye's military coup caused the currency to collapse and triggered a run on the bank. A large number of people turned to Bitcoin for safe havens

Recommend

People without chins have unstable careers.

The main reason for having no chin may be that yo...

What does a woman’s high brow peak mean?

As one of the traditional physiognomy techniques, ...

What is the numerological meaning of the dividing line of the index finger?

If the first dividing line of the index finger is...

Saturn Hill in Palmistry

Saturn Hill in Palmistry Saturn Hill in Palmistry...

Palmistry analysis of the Tianzi pattern on the palm

In palmistry, if a person's palm has the &quo...

How to explain whether a woman has small hands

It is said that hands are a woman’s second face. ...

Where is the fate line? Palmistry analysis

Some people know the names and meanings of the li...

What is the fortune of a woman with a mole on her shoulder?

Everyone has moles on their body, and moles in di...

Bitcoin surges past $1,000 as dollar falls during Chinese New Year

Affected by the decline of the US dollar and the ...

These people with these facial features are most likely to become the best.

Some people rely on luck to succeed in their care...