Grasping the future of the crypto market: Investors should maintain a strong curiosity

There was one thing about Saturday’s sharing that surprised me.

Because the original Twitter account was blocked, we re-applied for a new account. This is the first time I use this new account to communicate with you online, so I originally thought that there would not be many students leaving messages and asking questions, so I originally planned to spend a longer time to share with you:

- The country's likely economic trends over the next 10 to 15 years;

- The possible market trend of my country's assets under this trend;

- Under this trend, how can individuals allocate and invest their assets to hedge against various possible risks?

Unexpectedly, the number of questions left in the comments exceeded the number of questions left in any previous online communication.

Therefore, after answering everyone's questions, I could only use the last half hour to share with you the above three questions. Because the time was very short, I couldn't elaborate on many logics that would have taken at least two hours or even longer to explain, so in the last half hour of sharing, I mainly expressed my opinions and conclusions.

In the last half hour of sharing, I spoke some words quite bluntly. In order to avoid unnecessary complications, I deleted all the recordings. I hope you can understand.

But for the sharing in the first hour and a half, I think some topics can be expanded in detail in the article.

Many of these topics are about AI agents, and many students left messages asking about the Virtual platform.

I checked the WeChat article records and found that I first mentioned Virtual’s website in an article on October 31. When I wrote this article, I was not sure about this platform. As I wrote in the article, I just regarded it as a platform similar to ICO for financing AI agents.

Previously, I wrote about another project related to AI financing, which is ORA's IMO. However, after observing for a period of time, IMO did not become popular, so I gradually lost interest in the application of this financing method in AI. Therefore, when I found Virtual, it was just out of curiosity, and I introduced it to everyone purely as a knowledge sharing.

But what’s interesting is that in the comments under this article, there is no one asking about this project or its token. So I was curious:

- Are there any readers who go to this platform based on the information in the article?

- If you have read it, do you have any thoughts or feedback? Even negative feedback is fine.

I remember that when I first introduced Bored Ape in an article in 2021, at least a reader posted a comment. Although it was negative, it was still a feedback.

No matter how difficult the Virtual project is to understand, it is still easier to understand than NFT, right?

Are there any readers who will take a serious look at it?

About a month later, on December 2, I used a whole article to introduce the interview with Lianchuang in detail, because I think many of his thoughts and opinions are very good and very much in line with my appetite.

I always emphasize in my articles that the first thing I look at when I look at a project is the project founder. If a project's founder is qualified, the project track is good, and the strategy is generally appropriate, then the project is generally worthy of careful attention.

Therefore, I think the Virtual ecosystem has the potential to take off.

But there is still no feedback or comments about this project in the comments of that article.

I am also curious: did any of the readers read the interview carefully this time? If so, do any readers have any thoughts on this project?

The reason why I have this doubt comes from my own experience and lessons.

I wrote in an earlier article that I did not recognize the value of Bitcoin when I first heard about it, so I missed out on very early dividends.

But later, when everyone still said it was CX, I decided to study Bitcoin seriously:

Even if it is CX, I still want to see how it is CX.

This study changed the trajectory of my life.

This incident gave me a great experience/lesson:

In this ecosystem, when I discover something new, whether it is good or bad, I should pursue my inner curiosity and learn about it carefully.

If you understand it, as long as it is not too outrageous, too against the bottom line, or too far from your appetite, you can boldly try it while controlling the risks;

If you don’t participate after understanding it because you don’t know enough, there is nothing to regret - after all, you have done your best;

But if you don’t even try to understand it, and just treat it as news or information and throw it away after reading it, you may very likely lose out on important opportunities.

Therefore, I often call on everyone in my articles to awaken their curiosity, be more curious about the new things in this ecosystem, and explore more boldly.

Opportunities are often found through curiosity and desire to explore.

Without curiosity and desire to explore, you may not be able to seize the opportunity even if it is right in front of you.