Observation on the political attributes of crypto assets behind Trump’s election

As an emerging financial instrument, the political attributes of crypto assets should be analyzed in the context of history. In the past 75 years of global history, interest groups after World War II have often ignored the importance of civil rights and personal wealth in order to maintain the continuity and legitimacy of their own rule. This phenomenon has been reflected in many global political events, and the emergence of crypto assets can be seen as a challenge to this state. They provide a decentralized way to store and trade wealth, which can theoretically reduce the possibility of personal wealth being controlled by central authorities. One of the original intentions of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies was to create a financial system that does not rely on the central banking system, thereby reducing the government's ability to directly intervene in the economy.

In addition, the global and border-agnostic nature of crypto assets provides a potential tool to help circumvent economic sanctions and financial controls driven by power politics. For example, in certain countries with severe economic sanctions, citizens may turn to cryptocurrencies to maintain the continuity and privacy of their financial activities.

However, crypto assets are not without controversy. The extreme volatility of their value and regulatory uncertainty have raised questions about their use as a stable way to store assets. Crypto assets may be used for illegal transactions due to their anonymous nature, which increases the difficulty of government regulation and makes it challenging to integrate cryptocurrencies into the traditional financial system.

When considering the future development of crypto assets, we need to realize that this is not only a matter of technological progress, but also a reflection of changes in the global political and economic structure. As technology develops and political trends change, crypto assets may play an increasingly important role in the global economy, especially in improving financial inclusion and protecting asset security. This can be achieved through party games such as in the US election.

Trump and the American Redneck Group: The Break between Globalization and Grassroots Interests and Legal Challenges

Trump's loyal supporters, especially the "redneck" group in the United States, have long felt that they have been ignored by the American elite. In the implementation of the globalization strategy, these grassroots people have paid a huge price for the United States' globalization and military intervention, but their interests have not been rewarded accordingly.

The plight of America's rednecks and the conflict with globalization

The term "redneck" usually refers to the white working class in the southern and rural areas of the United States. Although the term has a certain derogatory meaning, many people also regard it as a symbol of identity. The redneck group often holds a conservative stance, is suspicious of the government and the elite, and is disgusted with globalization and multiculturalism. They usually face problems such as low education levels, limited employment opportunities, and insufficient social welfare. They live in the fluctuations of the global economy but fail to gain enough benefits from globalization.

The United States' overseas strategies, including military intervention, foreign policy and economic sanctions, are aimed at maintaining or expanding its global influence. However, in the eyes of the redneck group, these strategies are more about supporting the interests of the elite rather than the grassroots. Multinational companies such as Google, Amazon and Facebook, as well as military-industrial enterprises such as Lockheed Martin and Boeing, have gained huge market share and huge profits with the help of the United States' global strategies. These strategies have brought considerable returns to the elite by expanding the global market, collecting data and promoting military needs, further exacerbating the marginalization of the redneck group.

The disconnect between rednecks and globalization strategies

For these groups, the U.S. overseas strategy means that the rewards for their taxes and relatives who may sacrifice for the country (such as serving in the military) do not flow directly into their communities. Instead, they see the closure of local factories, the outflow of jobs, and the skewing of resources. Domestic resources in areas such as infrastructure, education, and medical care should have been used to improve people's livelihood, but they were allocated to projects that support global strategies. This disconnect of interests has caused the redneck group to distrust government policies and have a strong aversion to globalization and internationalism, and thus support populist and protectionist policies, especially Trump's " America First " policy.

Trump's legal challenges and political battles

At the same time, Trump is facing a series of legal challenges involving multiple areas, including hush money cases, confidential documents cases, election interference cases, etc. These cases have not only had a significant impact on Trump's personal and political life, but also had a profound impact on the legal and political landscape of the United States. In these cases, Trump tried to delay the legal process and buy more time through defensive strategies such as delaying trials, challenging presidential immunity, and shaping public opinion.

Background and political impact of the case

These cases have been widely interpreted as a political persecution of Trump and have become part of the political divide in the United States. Republicans see these cases as an attempt by Democrats to weaken Trump's political power, while Democrats see them as necessary accountability for Trump's misconduct. These cases not only test the boundaries of presidential immunity, but may also set legal precedents for future presidential accountability, affect public trust in the rule of law, and shape voters' political attitudes.

Trump's legal battles not only affect his personal fate, but also lay the foundation for how future presidents and high-profile politicians will be held accountable. The handling of these cases will directly affect the public's trust in the judicial system and have a profound impact on future elections. At the same time, these cases also provide a new model for how to balance politics and law, and shape the public's legal expectations of politicians' behavior.

Trump and American political polarization: Legal disputes, party loyalty and cultural conflict

Donald Trump's political career and the legal challenges he has faced reveal the complex interactions between American society, culture, politics, and human nature. His case highlights the depth of political polarization and the tolerance of American society for legal and moral disputes, especially under the influence of party loyalty and cultural media. The rift between Trump's supporters and opponents also provides an important perspective for us to understand the current political and social dynamics in the United States.

Political polarization and partisan loyalty

Trump's legal and moral controversies have become a concentrated manifestation of the polarization of American politics. In these controversies, the Republican base often sees Trump's legal battles as attacks from political opponents rather than real legal or moral issues. This reflects the powerful role of party loyalty. In a highly polarized political environment, party identity often overrides personal behavior or legal consequences. For Trump's supporters, no matter how many controversies he faces, party loyalty allows them to view these issues as an extension of political means rather than necessary legal and moral examinations.

Cultural and media influences

With the rise of partisan media, the public's vision is increasingly limited to news sources they identify with, forming an echo chamber effect. In this environment, Trump's scandals were downplayed or interpreted as political revenge by some media, which made many supporters turn a blind eye to his personal problems and even regard his anti-establishment image as a rebellion that is out of touch with traditional politics. Trump's success attracted voters who were disappointed with traditional politics. This group often ignored Trump's personal and legal problems and focused on the political changes he represented.

Empathy and legal norms

Trump's supporters have broad empathy for his status as a " political outsider " and the " injustice " he feels , an emotion that transcends concern for legal norms. In American society, the public often takes a flexible legal interpretation of the behavior of politicians, especially when these figures are in line with their cultural or economic interests. This tolerance may lead to a more relaxed interpretation of Trump's behavior, and also reflects the complex balance between emotional identification and legal provisions among some American voters.

Trump's re-election and social impact

Trump's reelection proves society's tolerance for change and redemption. Trump's political journey challenges traditional leadership concepts and shows that even a controversial figure can succeed in the American democratic system. Trump's reelection is not just a personal victory, it symbolizes the inclusiveness of the American political system and shows that even with huge differences, society can still choose leaders through democratic procedures.

Tom Hanks, Obama and Ideological Reflection

Public figures with great cultural influence, such as Tom Hanks and Barack Obama, often criticize Trump's leadership style and emphasize the values ​​of etiquette, morality, and traditional leadership. These contrasts reveal the deep ideological differences between liberalism and conservatism. Liberals may not fully understand the sentiments of Trump's supporters, and Trump's success reflects many people's criticism of elitism and alienation from liberal cultural icons.

Inclusive political system and social balance

The US political system, through its inclusiveness, allows for a wide range of political ideologies to be expressed, which is also an important force for social stability. Trump’s re-election may be seen as a symbol of the health of this political system - even controversial leaders can be elected through democratic procedures, indicating that the political system can maintain basic social order even in turmoil. However, this inclusiveness also brings challenges, especially in terms of weakening democratic norms and social cohesion, which may exacerbate the divisions in American society.

These complex political, cultural, and legal dynamics have profoundly influenced Trump's political career and shaped his long-term influence in American society, which is not only reflected at the political level, but is also deeply rooted in all aspects of culture and society.

Trump's Inaugural Address: Reshaping Government, Regulation, and Democratic Rights

Trump's inaugural address unfolded a series of themes around governance, justice, and social values, emphasizing his commitment to reshaping and restoring the American government system. The following are the core points related to "regulation, privacy, justice, and democratic rights":

Judicial and government reforms

Trump has pledged to end the weaponization of the Justice Department and government agencies that he believes have been used in the past to target perceived injustice or corruption. His stated goal is to rebalance justice and return to fair government practices that eliminate abuses of power and ensure judicial independence and administrative transparency.

Democratic rights

Trump stressed the need to return faith, wealth, democracy and freedom to the people, and promised to restore citizens' rights and voices by shifting to more democratic governance. He said he would give priority to the people's demands, promote a more democratic political environment and ensure that the government responds to public needs.

Regulatory and privacy issues

Although the speech did not list specific policies in detail, it can be inferred from its context that Trump intends to restructure the current regulatory system, especially in terms of national security and border control. This change may be achieved by declaring a national emergency and adjusting immigration laws, thereby re-examining policies that may affect privacy and ensuring that regulation is in line with the balance between national interests and citizen privacy.

Restoring trust and transparency in government

Trump acknowledged the current crisis of trust in the government and expressed his intention to restore the integrity and competence of the administration. He promised to take measures to increase government transparency, ensure that the public's trust in government institutions is restored, and strengthen government accountability.

Overall, Trump's speech reflected an intention to significantly change policies and government methods, re-examining regulation, privacy, and the balance of judicial and democratic rights to better align with the values ​​and needs of the people. Such reforms are intended to restore trust in government while protecting individual rights and freedoms.

The combination of Trump and crypto assets: a multi-dimensional interpretation of historical background and political game

Trump’s relationship with crypto assets reflects a complex interaction at a broader historical, economic, and social level. The following analysis is divided into several key parts, exploring the background and influencing factors:

Historical Background of Japanese and Korean Large Companies

Japanese Corporations: From military expansion during World War II to postwar transformation, Japanese corporations such as Mitsubishi and Sumitomo rose through government connections and postwar economic opportunities to become modern, diversified companies.

South Korea's major companies: South Korea's economic miracle, especially the rise of Samsung and Hyundai, was due to government-driven economic development policies and international aid that helped the country move from post-war poverty to economic powerhouse.

The “Lost Twenty Years” and the Dilemma of Young People

Japan’s “lost 20 years”: Since the 1990s, Japan has experienced two decades of economic stagnation. Young people have faced employment difficulties, social mobility has declined, and a large number of “vagrants” and “otakus” have emerged.

South Korea’s challenges: Although South Korea did not have a similar “lost 20 years,” young people in recent years have also faced high unemployment, soaring housing prices and deteriorating working conditions, especially in an economy dominated by large companies.

Postwar Interest Groups and Civil Rights Issues

• Influence of interest groups: After the war, large Japanese and Korean companies have developed strong economic and political influence, safeguarding their own interests through close ties with the government, which may sometimes sacrifice the democratic process or the interests of the people.

• Civil rights and wealth inequality: While Japan and South Korea’s economic models have driven national economic growth, they have also exacerbated social inequality, especially in terms of workers’ rights and income distribution.

The Threat of World War III and Global Politics

• Global political context: Although there is no evidence that global power groups deliberately use the threat of World War III to manipulate the situation, the geopolitical tensions of the Cold War and post-Cold War did provide an excuse for strengthening solidarity in the domestic affairs of some countries.

• Economic and political interests: Economic policies following globalization often favor wealthy countries and multinational corporations, while the needs and civil rights issues of developing countries may be ignored.

The Problems of America’s Military-Industrial Complex, the Establishment, and Multinational Internet Companies

• Military-industrial complexes: Lockheed Martin, Boeing and other military-industrial complexes in the United States earn huge profits through government contracts and occupy a prominent position in defense policy. This concentration of power leads to military policies that lean toward expansionism and ignore diplomatic solutions, which in turn affects domestic social spending.

• Influence of the establishment: The establishment usually represents vested interest groups. The concentration of power may lead to policies that are biased towards protecting the interests of these groups rather than the broad interests of the people, thereby weakening the effectiveness of democracy.

• Multinational Internet companies: Technology giants such as Google, Amazon, and Facebook have been criticized for market monopoly and privacy issues, especially the controversy over the balance between data collection, content review and freedom of speech.

The Role of the Democratic Party and Political Gaming

• Policies and Reforms: The Democratic Party has promoted regulation of military-industrial enterprises and multinational Internet companies in some areas, but it also faces pressure from within and outside the party and must find a balance between promoting social justice, economic development, and maintaining competitiveness.

• Intra-party divisions and external challenges: The struggle between some progressives and establishment factions within the Democratic Party and changes in the external political environment continue to affect the intensity and direction of policy implementation within the party.

Trump and crypto assets

• The intersection of politics and economics: Trump's supporters, including some working-class people in traditional industries, feel alienated by modern political elites and the injustice brought about by the globalized economy. Therefore, Trump uses crypto assets as an anti-establishment tool to win the support of many voters who are disappointed with the existing system, especially in their distrust of the traditional financial system.

• Redistribution of wealth and power: Crypto assets provide Trump with a platform to challenge traditional financial and political elites, emphasizing political slogans against " Wall Street " and " establishment " , which are both culturally symbolic and attempt to promote a new economic model.

In summary, the combination of Trump and crypto assets is a multi-layered political phenomenon, which is not only related to the global historical background and the unequal distribution of the economic system, but also closely related to the power struggles among interest groups, military-industrial enterprises and technology giants in American politics. The role played by the Democratic Party in this process is complex and full of games, with both attempts to promote reforms and pressure to maintain the status quo.

The reason why the Democratic Party lost votes: the deep connection between history, system and class struggle

Behind the Democratic Party's loss of votes lies the class system in American history, the continuation of the post-war political system, and the contradiction between civil rights and the interests of the working class. The following analysis of multi-dimensional factors related to the families of successive presidents, the experience of World War II, and the United States' global hegemony reveals the root cause of the Democratic Party's current political dilemma.

Presidential Families and World War II

• Franklin D. Roosevelt: As President of the United States during World War II, Roosevelt led important wartime decisions and promoted historic policies such as the Lend-Lease Act and the establishment of the United Nations, which laid the foundation for the postwar world.

• John F. Kennedy: During World War II, Kennedy served in the U.S. Navy and experienced the Pacific theater, which became an important part of his political career.

• Barack Obama and Joe Biden: The family backgrounds of both presidents are indirectly linked to World War II. Although their immediate family members did not directly serve in the military, their family's wartime experience has become an important part of their personal political narratives. Obama demonstrated his understanding of American history and the sacrifices of soldiers by mentioning his grandfather's experience in World War II, while Biden strengthened his sympathy for the struggles of the American middle class by describing his father's difficult life during the Great Depression and World War II.

The Democratic Party’s Relationship with the Existing Political System

The Democratic Party tends to maintain the current dollar system and the existing political structure, especially since many senior figures in the party have gained support and success through the existing system. The growth background of these leaders in the party makes the Democratic Party more conservative in policy implementation and difficult to break through the traditional framework. These leaders usually come from higher classes and represent interests based on the post-war system.

The connection between global hegemony and Middle Eastern interests

The United States' global hegemony, especially its policy of gaining benefits in the Middle East, has led to unrest in Middle Eastern countries and nations, and indirectly contributed to the 9/11 incident. This incident greatly affected the domestic judicial system in the United States, strengthened the government's monitoring and control, and sacrificed civil rights. As a supporter of globalization, the Democratic Party has failed to effectively protect the economic interests of the domestic people, especially the working class who rely on traditional industries and energy, while maintaining global interests.

The influence of the postwar establishment

The post-war establishment still firmly controls the American system and ideology, and some leaders within the Democratic Party have achieved political success through this system. However, as the times change, the constraints of this system are becoming increasingly apparent. The Democratic Party has failed to effectively address civil rights issues, especially the neglect of energy industry workers and low-income groups in the Rust Belt, which has alienated this part of the electorate from the Democratic Party. They have turned to other political forces, especially under the influence of anti-establishment figures such as Trump.

The reasons why the Democratic Party lost votes are multifaceted, including its deep connection with the historical class system, its dependence on the existing political and economic system, and its neglect of the interests of the traditional working class. The political elite background during World War II and the continuation of the post-war system have made the Democratic Party often conservative in its policies and difficult to respond to the growing needs of the people. Ultimately, this series of factors has led to the gradual loss of the Democratic Party's voter base.

The intersection of decentralization and civil rights: Reflections on cryptocurrency, freedom, and social structure

The rise of cryptocurrency and blockchain is deeply connected to the core ideas of civil rights. The following analysis explores how decentralization fits in with civil rights issues such as privacy protection, financial inclusion, censorship resistance, and democratic decentralization, and how this idea plays out in the current social and political structure.

Reducing government control: protecting privacy and freedom

Cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin reduce government or central bank intervention through decentralized networks, which is consistent with the demands of the civil rights movement for personal privacy protection and reduced government control. The operation of cryptocurrencies allows individuals to freely engage in economic activities without worrying about government monitoring or monetary policy manipulation, thus maintaining economic freedom and privacy rights.

Financial inclusion: accessible financial services

Decentralized finance (DeFi) provides new financial transaction channels for those who are ignored or excluded in the traditional banking system (such as the unbanked groups). This is in line with the demands for economic rights in the civil rights movement, enabling more people to participate in the global economy and improving social and economic inclusiveness.

Censorship resistance: free speech and resistance to oppression

Blockchain technology makes it difficult for funds to be censored or frozen, which is particularly important in the case of political oppression or economic sanctions. The decentralized financial system supports the need for free speech and resistance to political oppression, further connecting with the core values ​​of civil rights for free expression and resistance to oppression.

Decentralization: Democracy and Autonomy

Decentralization means that no single entity can control the entire network, which helps promote a more democratic economic system and reduce the concentration of power. Decentralization supports the idea of ​​​​balance of power in civil rights and promotes a more fair and autonomous economic environment.

The political attributes of crypto assets and the current state of global society

Decentralization is closely related to the right to individual development. It reflects an idea of ​​opposing the dominance of postwar interest groups and reshaping the economic and social structure. After World War II, in order to maintain the survival and legitimacy of their rule, the interest groups ignored civil rights and personal wealth, set standards that only served GDP in all aspects of society , and led to the degradation of social functions and the alienation of the working class. This process is similar to the results of the " Rat Utopia " experiment.

The " Rat Utopia " experiment: a metaphor for the collapse of social structure

Experimental background and design: John Calhoun's "Rat Utopia" experiments in the 1960s and 1970s simulated a "perfect" environment with unlimited food and water, but space became a limiting factor.

Experimental results: As the number of rats grows, the social structure collapses, and problems such as violence, abnormal sexual behavior (ambiguity in gender), and decreased reproduction rate (decreased fertility) appear, eventually leading to the collapse of the rat colony and the complete disintegration of social functions. The "beautiful rats" in the experiment represent individualism and self-isolation in society, showing indifference to collective responsibility, leading to the overall degeneration of society, but this is caused by the operating mechanism of the social environment in which the rats live.

Manifestations of social function degeneration: Violence, sexual behavior disorders, loss of maternal behavior and other phenomena occurred in the experiment, reflecting the collapse of social structure and the extremism of individual behavior.

The current state of global society and the warning from "rat utopia"

This experiment warns of the connection between excessive population density, artificial resource regulation and the collapse of social structures. Currently, the global society is experiencing similar pressures, especially in the context of excessive population concentration, uneven resource distribution and unbalanced economic systems (rich countries and poor people). These problems can be reflected and alleviated to some extent through decentralized technical architectures, supporting more democratic and inclusive social systems.

Decentralization is not only a technological innovation, but also a profound reflection on today's social structure and political system. Through cryptocurrency and blockchain, decentralization provides a new perspective on personal freedom, privacy protection, financial inclusion, anti-censorship and democratic governance. This emerging field coincides with the core values ​​of the civil rights movement, while also challenging the imbalance of the existing social and economic system.

Summary: Political attributes and future trends of crypto assets

The birth and development of crypto assets have demonstrated their unique positive significance in the complex context of global politics and economy. Although the world is still in the turmoil of class and ethnic conflicts, and the political and military situation is full of uncertainty, the trend of civil rights development is irreversible and is reflected globally. In the next four years, advanced civil rights organizations represented by the crypto community are expected to have a profound impact on all aspects of politics, economy and culture in the United States. Trump's re-election after gaining the support of the crypto community shows that an inclusive system can promote economic prosperity while benefiting the system more. As the political pressure on Trump increases, he will become more and more aware of the importance of the crypto community and may even regard it as a key support force.

The unique political attributes of crypto assets are merging with the trend of civil rights development, gradually becoming an important trend of global economic and social change. Although this process is accompanied by many challenges - such as the arrest of the founder of Silk Road, the sanctions on crypto mixers, the political and legal trials faced by Trump, assassination plots, and the prediction of Musk's persecution - its development prospects are still bright. These setbacks are not only a manifestation of the conflict between innovation and traditional systems, but also highlight the potential and necessity of crypto assets in promoting decentralization and civil rights protection.